The definition of Medical Malpractice, according to the Pattern Jury Instructions, which are given to jurors in a trial.

NY Accident Blog

New York Car Accidents

view all

Medical Malpractice

view all

Defective Products

view all

Premises Liability

view all

Construction Accidents

view all

Slips and Falls, Dog Bites, Stairway Accidents

view all

General

view all

How We Help New Yorkers:

Document Library

New York Car Accidents

Child Abuse & Molestation

Medical Malpractice

Nursing Home & Assisted Care Abuse

Defective Products

Motorcycle Accidents

Burns and Disfigurements

Construction Accidents

Bad Faith Insurance, Unreasonable Claim Denial

Slips and Falls, Dog Bites, Stairway Accidents

Wrongful Death Claims

Municipal Liability

General

Newsletters

General

more

Medical Malpractice

Medical Malpractice, according to the Pattern Jury Instructions (which are given to jurors in a trial), is the negligence of a doctor. Negligence is the failure to use reasonable care under the circumstances, doing something that a reasonably prudent doctor would not do under the circumstances, or failing to do something that a reasonably prudent doctor would do under the circumstances. It is a deviation or departure from accepted practice.

A doctor who renders medical service to a patient is obligated to have that reasonable degree of knowledge and skill that is expected of an (average doctor, average specialist) who (performs, provides) that (operation, treatment, medical service) in the medical community in which the doctor practices. ([If there is evidence that the doctor should have complied with standards that exceed the standards of the medical community in which the doctor practices, the folowing should be charged:] The doctor must also comply with minimum (statewide, national) standards of care.)

The law recognizes that there are differences in the abilities of doctors, just as there are differences in the abilities of people engaged in other activities. To practice medicine a doctor is not required to have the extraordinary knowledge and ability that belongs to a few doctors of exceptional ability. However every doctor is required to keep reasonably informed of new developments in (his, her) field and to practice (medicine, surgery) in accordance with approved methods and means of treatment in general use. A doctor must also use his or her best judgment and whatever superior knowledge and skill (he, she) possesses, even if the knowledge and skill exceeds that possessed by the (average doctor, average specialist) in the medical community where the doctor practices.

By undertaking to perform a medical service, a doctor does not guarantee a good result. The fact that there was a bad result to the patient, by itself, does not make the doctor liable. The doctor is liable only if (he, she) was negligent. Whether the doctor was negligent is to be decided on the basis of the facts and conditions existing at the time of the claimed negligence.

[This paragraph should only be charged when there is evidence of medically acceptable alternatives.] A doctor is not liable for an error in judgment if (he, she) does what (he, she) decides is best after careful evaluation if it is a judgment that a reasonably prudent doctor could have made under the circumstances.

If the doctor is negligent, that is, lacks the skill or knowledge required of (him, her) in providing a medical service, or fails to use reasonable care in providing the service, or fails to exercise his or her best judgment, and such failure is a substantial factor in causing harm to the patient, then the doctor is responsible for the injury or harm caused.

A doctor's responsibility is the same regardless of whether (he, she) was paid.